Quadro K3000M vs Tesla C2050
When comparing Quadro K3000M and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K3000M and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2050
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K3000M | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 217% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
- Quadro K3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K3000M has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Quadro K3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K3000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 80 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Quadro K3000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 131% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 66% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 51% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 118% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 83% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 120% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 78% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 114% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Quadro K3000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K3000M | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N14E-Q1 | GF100 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 1 June 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 576 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 654 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.39 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 753.4 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | 90 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |