Quadro K4100M vs Tesla C2050
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K4100M and Tesla C2050, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K4100M stacks up against Tesla C2050, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2050
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K4100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4100M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K4100M | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 138% more power consumption, than Quadro K4100M.
- Quadro K4100M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K4100M has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Quadro K4100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K4100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K4100M is 132 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Quadro K4100M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K4100M is 200 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 35% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 41% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 13% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro K4100M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K4100M | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N15E-Q3-A2 | GF100 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1152 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 67.78 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,627 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | 90 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |