Quadro M2200 vs Tesla C2050
When choosing between Quadro M2200 and Tesla C2050, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro M2200 and Tesla C2050.
Tesla C2050
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M2200 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 332% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Quadro M2200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 120 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Quadro M2200 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 2508 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro M2200 and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 240−250 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 180−190 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 26% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 25% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 24% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 22% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M2200 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Code name | N17P-Q3 | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 January 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 694 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1870 Million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5508 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |