Quadro P520 vs Tesla C2050
When comparing Quadro P520 and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro P520 and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2050
Quadro P520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P520 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro P520 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro P520.
- Quadro P520 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Quadro P520 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P520 is 729 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Quadro P520 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P520 is 3000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 63% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 37% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 60% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 46% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 73% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 43% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 11% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 13% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro P520 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Code name | GF100 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 May 2019 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1493 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | + | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |