Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Tesla C2050
When comparing Radeon HD 4870 X2 and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon HD 4870 X2 and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon HD 4870 X2
Tesla C2050
Main Specs
Radeon HD 4870 X2 | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 286 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI |
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 has 20% more power consumption, than Tesla C2050.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla C2050 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4870 X2 is 126 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 is 19 mm longer, than Tesla C2050.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 4870 X2 is 600 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 92% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 128% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 216% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 185% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 4870 X2 | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Fermi |
Code name | R700 | GF100 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 August 2008 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 800 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 28.00 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,120.0 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | 248 mm |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |