Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs Tesla C2050
In this comparison between Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2050
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x2 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is 106 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire and Tesla C2050 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 2100 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 18% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Far Cry 5 is 13% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Fortnite is 12% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Grand Theft Auto V is 10% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Metro Exodus is 13% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 13% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2050. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Terascale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Blackcomb XT | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 6 January 2011 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1920 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 680 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 2x1700 Million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs FirePro S9050
- Tesla C2050 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Tesla C2050 vs FirePro S9050
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs Quadro M2000M
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Tesla C2050 vs Quadro M2000M