Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics vs Tesla C2050
In this comparison between Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2050
Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)
238 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
3 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI
Check Price
Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
Core clock speed of Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics is 146 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics is manufactured by 32 / 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1200 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
18−20
ultra / 1080p
0−1
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
10−12
35−40
medium / 1080p
2−3
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
3−4
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
12−14
60−65
medium / 1080p
4−5
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 471% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
low / 768p
110−120
220−230
medium / 768p
85−90
190−200
ultra / 1080p
35−40
110−120
QHD / 1440p
−
70−75
4K / 2160p
10−11
35−40
high / 768p
60−65
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 133% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
40−45
100−110
ultra / 1080p
18−20
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 120% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
high / 1080p
2−3
21−24
ultra / 1080p
2−3
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
0−1
7−8
low / 720p
9−10
45−50
medium / 1080p
3−4
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
110−120
medium / 1080p
7−8
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 253% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
high / 1080p
2−3
30−35
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
low / 720p
14−16
60−65
medium / 1080p
5−6
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 528% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
low / 768p
40−45
95−100
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
3−4
35−40
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
high / 1080p
1−2
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
2−3
35−40
medium / 1080p
2−3
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 950% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
55−60
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
65−70
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
4−5
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 475% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
low / 768p
7−8
65−70
medium / 768p
6−7
40−45
high / 1080p
3−4
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 780% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
35−40
high / 768p
30−33
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
Full Specs
Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
Tesla C2050
Architecture
Fermi
Code name
GF100
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
1 August 2013
25 July 2011
Pipelines
768
448
Core clock speed
720 / 775 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
32 / 28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
64 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 - 2000 MHz
3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
90 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Check Price
