Radeon Pro 5500M vs Tesla C2050
When choosing between Radeon Pro 5500M and Tesla C2050, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon Pro 5500M and Tesla C2050.
Tesla C2050
Radeon Pro 5500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5500M here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 5500M | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 180% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 5500M.
- Radeon Pro 5500M is connected by PCIe 4.0 x8, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro 5500M has 5 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon Pro 5500M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 5500M is build with Navi / RDNA architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Radeon Pro 5500M is manufactured by 7 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5500M is 9000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon Pro 5500M and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Radeon Pro 5500M and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Fortnite is 81% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla C2050. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 5500M | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Navi / RDNA | Fermi |
Code name | Navi 14 | GF100 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 13 November 2019 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
Transistor count | 6,400 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 139.2 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |