Radeon Pro 555X vs Tesla C2050
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon Pro 555X and Tesla C2050, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon Pro 555X stacks up against Tesla C2050, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2050
Radeon Pro 555X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro 555X | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 217% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 555X.
- Radeon Pro 555X is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 555X.
- Radeon Pro 555X is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 555X is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 555X is 281 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon Pro 555X is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555X is 2080 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Radeon Pro 555X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555X in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro 555X | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | Fermi |
| Code name | Polaris 21 | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 June 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.54 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.6 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |