Radeon Pro 5600M vs Tesla C2050
When comparing Radeon Pro 5600M and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon Pro 5600M and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2050
Radeon Pro 5600M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5600M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5600M here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 5600M | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 376% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 5600M.
- Radeon Pro 5600M is connected by PCIe 4.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro 5600M has 5 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon Pro 5600M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 5600M is build with Navi / RDNA architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Radeon Pro 5600M is manufactured by 7 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1460 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 5600M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 175% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Battlefield 5 is 177% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 5600M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 230−240 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 150−160 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Dota 2 is 21% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Far Cry 5 is 160% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | − |
low / 720p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Fortnite is 141% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | − |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Forza Horizon 4 is 160% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Grand Theft Auto V is 110% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Metro Exodus is 206% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Minecraft is 8% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 172% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | − | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Tesla C2050. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 5600M | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Navi / RDNA | Fermi |
Code name | Navi 10 | GF100 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 15 June 2020 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1265 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 164.8 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1540 MBps | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 394.2 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |