Radeon Pro 560X vs Tesla C2050
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon Pro 560X and Tesla C2050, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon Pro 560X stacks up against Tesla C2050, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2050
Radeon Pro 560X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro 560X | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 217% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- Radeon Pro 560X is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro 560X has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon Pro 560X is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 560X is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 333 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 2080 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| Radeon Pro 560X and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Battlefield 5 is 3% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon Pro 560X and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Radeon Pro 560X and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Far Cry 5 is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Fortnite is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Grand Theft Auto V is 2% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| Radeon Pro 560X and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| Radeon Pro 560X and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| Radeon Pro 560X and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| Radeon Pro 560X and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| Radeon Pro 560X and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro 560X | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | Fermi |
| Code name | Polaris 21 | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 June 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 907 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 64.26 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |