Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Tesla C2050
In this comparison between Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon PRO WX 2100 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2050
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon PRO WX 2100 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 580% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 3000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 131% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 72% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 118% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 90% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 135% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 78% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 114% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon PRO WX 2100 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | Fermi |
| Code name | Polaris 12 | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 21 March 2018 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |