Radeon R5 M435 vs Tesla C2050

When comparing Radeon R5 M435 and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon R5 M435 and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

Radeon R5 M435

Tesla C2050

Main Specs

	Radeon R5 M435	Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)		238 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI

Radeon R5 M435 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 M435.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Radeon R5 M435 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Radeon R5 M435 is 206 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Radeon R5 M435 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 M435 is 1500 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	18−20
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	10−12	35−40
medium / 1080p	2−3	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Radeon R5 M435.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	2−3	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	10−12	60−65
medium / 1080p	4−5	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 566% more, than Radeon R5 M435.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R5 M435.
low / 768p	110−120	220−230
medium / 768p	80−85	190−200
ultra / 1080p	35−40	110−120
QHD / 1440p	−	70−75
4K / 2160p	9−10	35−40
high / 768p	55−60	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 141% more, than Radeon R5 M435.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	12−14	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon R5 M435.
low / 768p	70−75	110−120
medium / 768p	40−45	100−110
ultra / 1080p	16−18	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 120% more, than Radeon R5 M435.
high / 1080p	1−2	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	0−1	7−8
low / 720p	9−10	45−50
medium / 1080p	2−3	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 675% more, than Radeon R5 M435.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	5−6	21−24
QHD / 1440p	1−2	14−16
low / 720p	45−50	110−120
medium / 1080p	6−7	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 253% more, than Radeon R5 M435.
high / 1080p	2−3	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
low / 720p	14−16	60−65
medium / 1080p	5−6	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 528% more, than Radeon R5 M435.
low / 768p	40−45	95−100
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	2−3	35−40
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 233% more, than Radeon R5 M435.
high / 1080p	1−2	10−12
ultra / 1080p	0−1	9−10
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	2−3	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 1100% more, than Radeon R5 M435.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	55−60	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R5 M435.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	24−27	65−70
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R5 M435.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	3−4	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	3−4	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 666% more, than Radeon R5 M435.
low / 768p	6−7	65−70
medium / 768p	6−7	40−45
high / 1080p	3−4	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	0−1	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 780% more, than Radeon R5 M435.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	12−14	35−40
high / 768p	27−30	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Radeon R5 M435.

Full Specs

	Radeon R5 M435	Tesla C2050
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi
Code name	Jet	GF100
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	15 May 2016	25 July 2011
Pipelines	320	448
Core clock speed	780 MHz	574 MHz
Boost Clock	1030 MHz
Transistor count	690 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	20.60	32.14
Floating-point performance	547.2 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length		248 mm
Memory bus width	64 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	36 GB/s	144.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		90 Mh/s

Radeon R5 M435 vs Tesla C2050

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares