Radeon R7 260X vs Tesla C2050
When comparing Radeon R7 260X and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon R7 260X and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2050
Main Specs
Radeon R7 260X
Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)
115 Watt
238 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1 x 6-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
3 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2050 has 106% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 260X.
Radeon R7 260X is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R7 260X has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Radeon R7 260X is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Radeon R7 260X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2050 is 78 mm longer, than Radeon R7 260X.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−11
QHD / 1440p
4−5
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
20−22
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 12% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
24−27
QHD / 1440p
8−9
8−9
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 12% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
low / 768p
210−220
220−230
medium / 768p
180−190
190−200
ultra / 1080p
100−110
110−120
QHD / 1440p
55−60
70−75
4K / 2160p
30−35
35−40
high / 768p
140−150
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
95−100
100−110
ultra / 1080p
65−70
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
16−18
20−22
QHD / 1440p
16−18
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
20−22
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
110−120
medium / 1080p
55−60
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 6% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
high / 1080p
27−30
30−35
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
10−11
10−12
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
30−33
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
low / 768p
85−90
95−100
medium / 768p
75−80
85−90
high / 1080p
30−35
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
3−4
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
high / 1080p
10−11
10−12
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
4K / 2160p
3−4
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
65−70
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
low / 768p
55−60
65−70
medium / 768p
35−40
40−45
high / 1080p
20−22
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Tesla C2050.
Full Specs
Radeon R7 260X
Tesla C2050
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Fermi
Code name
Bonaire
GF100
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
8 October 2013
25 July 2011
Pipelines
896
448
Core clock speed
574 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
Transistor count
2,080 million
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
61.60
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,971 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
170 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
104 GB/s
144.0 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.3
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
2.0
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
225 Mh/s
90 Mh/s
Eyefinity
+
Design
reference
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
5.16 Mh/s
Check Price
