Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Tesla C2050

When comparing Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Tesla C2050

Main Specs

  Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP) 238 Watt
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB
Display Connectors 1x DVI
 
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
  • Core clock speed of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri is 146 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
  • Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 7−8 18−20
ultra / 1080p 4−5 10−11
QHD / 1440p 0−1 4−5
4K / 2160p 4−5
low / 720p 18−20 35−40
medium / 1080p 9−10 21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.

Full Specs

  Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri Tesla C2050
Architecture GCN Fermi
Code name Kaveri Spectre GF100
Type Desktop Workstation
Release date 14 January 2014 25 July 2011
Pipelines 384 448
Core clock speed 720 MHz 574 MHz
Transistor count 3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Texture fill rate 32.14
Floating-point performance 1,030.4 gflops
Length 248 mm
Memory bus width 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth 144.0 GB/s
Shared memory +
DirectX DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.1
OpenGL 4.6
OpenCL 1.1
Vulkan N/A
CUDA 2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 90 Mh/s