Radeon R9 M360 vs Tesla C2050
When choosing between Radeon R9 M360 and Tesla C2050, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon R9 M360 and Tesla C2050.
Radeon R9 M360
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Tesla C2050
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
Radeon R9 M360 | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
- Radeon R9 M360 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M360 has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M360 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M360 is 326 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon R9 M360 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M360.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 131% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 51% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 118% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 83% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 120% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 78% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 114% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 24% more, than Radeon R9 M360. |
Full Specs
Radeon R9 M360 | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Tropo | GF100 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 May 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 512 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.60 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 8 | |