Radeon R9 M370X vs Tesla C2050
In this comparison between Radeon R9 M370X and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R9 M370X will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2050
Radeon R9 M370X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M370X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M370X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M370X | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M370X.
- Radeon R9 M370X is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M370X is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M370X is 226 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon R9 M370X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M370X is 1500 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 97% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 128% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 216% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 185% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M370X | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Cape Verde | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 19 May 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1500 Million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12 (FL 11_1), Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 125 Mh/s | 90 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |