Radeon R9 M385 vs Tesla C2050
In this comparison between Radeon R9 M385 and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R9 M385 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2050
Radeon R9 M385 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385 here:
Main Specs
Radeon R9 M385 | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M385 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M385 has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon R9 M385 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M385 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Radeon R9 M385 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 63% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 37% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 31% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 60% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 46% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 73% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 43% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 11% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 13% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M385. |
Full Specs
Radeon R9 M385 | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
Code name | Strato | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 16 June 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 896 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 56.00 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |