Radeon R9 M470X vs Tesla C2050
When comparing Radeon R9 M470X and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon R9 M470X and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2050
Radeon R9 M470X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M470X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M470X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M470X | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M470X is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M470X has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon R9 M470X is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M470X is build with GCN 2 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M470X is 526 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon R9 M470X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M470X is 3000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| Radeon R9 M470X and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M470X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R9 M470X and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Radeon R9 M470X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Radeon R9 M470X and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| Radeon R9 M470X and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M470X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| Radeon R9 M470X and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M470X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| Radeon R9 M470X and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M470X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| Radeon R9 M470X and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M470X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M470X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M470X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Radeon R9 M470X and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M470X | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | GCN 2 | Fermi |
| Code name | Emerald | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 14 May 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 896 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 61.60 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |