Radeon R9 M485X vs Tesla C2050
In this comparison between Radeon R9 M485X and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R9 M485X will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2050
Radeon R9 M485X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M485X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M485X here:
Main Specs
Radeon R9 M485X | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB MB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M485X has 5% more power consumption, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon R9 M485X is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M485X has 5 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon R9 M485X is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M485X is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M485X is 149 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon R9 M485X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M485X is 2000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 37% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Battlefield 5 is 40% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon R9 M485X and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 240−250 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 210−220 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 180−190 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Radeon R9 M485X and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Dota 2 is 13% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Far Cry 5 is 34% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Fortnite is 35% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. |
Full Specs
Radeon R9 M485X | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | GCN 3 | Fermi |
Code name | Amethyst | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 14 May 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |