Radeon RX 460 mobile vs Tesla C2050
When comparing Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2050
Radeon RX 460 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 460 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
Radeon RX 460 mobile | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 332% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 mobile is 3000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 1% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 4% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
Radeon RX 460 mobile | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Polaris | Fermi |
Code name | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 8 August 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 896 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.08 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2,115 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |