Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Tesla C2050
When choosing between Radeon RX 480 mobile and Tesla C2050, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon RX 480 mobile and Tesla C2050.
Tesla C2050
Radeon RX 480 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 480 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 480 mobile here:
Main Specs
| Radeon RX 480 mobile | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 138% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 480 mobile.
- Radeon RX 480 mobile is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon RX 480 mobile has 5 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon RX 480 mobile is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Radeon RX 480 mobile is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Radeon RX 480 mobile is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 480 mobile is 5000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 37% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 26% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 43% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon RX 480 mobile | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | Fermi |
| Code name | Polaris | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 August 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1077 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 155.1 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,963 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Tesla C2075
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000
- Tesla C2050 vs Tesla C2075
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Quadro M2000M
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Tesla C2050 vs Quadro M2000M