Radeon RX 560X mobile vs Tesla C2050
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon RX 560X mobile and Tesla C2050, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon RX 560X mobile stacks up against Tesla C2050, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2050
Radeon RX 560X mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 560X mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 560X mobile here:
Main Specs
Radeon RX 560X mobile | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 266% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 560X mobile.
- Radeon RX 560X mobile is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon RX 560X mobile has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon RX 560X mobile is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Radeon RX 560X mobile is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 560X mobile is 598 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon RX 560X mobile is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 560X mobile is 3000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Battlefield 5 is 29% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon RX 560X mobile and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 210−220 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Far Cry 5 is 26% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Fortnite is 25% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 21% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 100−105 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 26% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X mobile in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2050. |
Full Specs
Radeon RX 560X mobile | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Polaris | Fermi |
Code name | Polaris 11 | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 January 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 1172 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1275 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2,611 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 92.8 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |