Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs Tesla C2050
In this comparison between Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2050
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 here:
Main Specs
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 is build with Vega architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 is manufactured by 7 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 12% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Far Cry 5 is 8% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Fortnite is 12% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Metro Exodus is 13% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2050. |
Full Specs
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Vega | Fermi |
Code name | Vega Raven Ridge | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 7 January 2020 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 512 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1750 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs GeForce GTX 780M
- Tesla C2050 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
- Tesla C2050 vs GeForce GTX 780M
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs Quadro M2000M
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Tesla C2050 vs Quadro M2000M