Radeon RX Vega 9 vs Tesla C2050
In this comparison between Radeon RX Vega 9 and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon RX Vega 9 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2050
Radeon RX Vega 9 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 9 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 9 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon RX Vega 9 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon RX Vega 9 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Radeon RX Vega 9 is build with Vega architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Radeon RX Vega 9 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 38% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 35% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 23% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 36% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon RX Vega 9 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Vega | Fermi |
| Code name | Vega Raven Ridge | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 26 October 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 576 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Check Price |