Tesla C2050 vs UHD Graphics 615
When comparing Tesla C2050 and UHD Graphics 615, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Tesla C2050 and UHD Graphics 615 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2050
UHD Graphics 615 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics 615 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics 615 here:
Main Specs
| Tesla C2050 | UHD Graphics 615 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 1486% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 615.
- Tesla C2050 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 615 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Tesla C2050 is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics 615 - in Laptops.
- Tesla C2050 is build with Fermi architecture, and UHD Graphics 615 - with Gen. 9 Amber Lake.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 274 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 615.
- Tesla C2050 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 615 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 700% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 145% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 120% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 675% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 278% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 633% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 204% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 3600% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 32% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 106% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1133% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1000% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
Full Specs
| Tesla C2050 | UHD Graphics 615 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Gen. 9 Amber Lake |
| Code name | GF100 | Kaby-Lake GT2 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 25 July 2011 | 30 August 2018 |
| Pipelines | 448 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | 25.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |