Tesla C2050 vs UHD Graphics 630
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Tesla C2050 and UHD Graphics 630. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Tesla C2050 and UHD Graphics 630. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2050
UHD Graphics 630
Main Specs
Tesla C2050 | UHD Graphics 630 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
- Tesla C2050 has 1486% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 630.
- Tesla C2050 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 630 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Tesla C2050 is build with Fermi architecture, and UHD Graphics 630 - with Gen. 9.5.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 274 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 630.
- Tesla C2050 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 630 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 270% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | − |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 108% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 383% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 152% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 280% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 163% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 32% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 275% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than UHD Graphics 630. |
Full Specs
Tesla C2050 | UHD Graphics 630 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Gen. 9.5 |
Code name | GF100 | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 25 July 2011 | 1 October 2017 |
Pipelines | 448 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | 26.45 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | 460.8 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |