FirePro M4000 vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M4000 and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M4000 stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2070
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000 | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 621% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 5 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 26 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 1512 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 118% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 28% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 51% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 74% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 128% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 18% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 72% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than FirePro M4000. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4000 | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
Code name | Cape Verde GLM | GF100 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 1 July 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 512 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bus support | n/a | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
Check Price |