FirePro M5100 vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M5100 and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M5100 stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2070
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro M5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5100 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M5100 | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- FirePro M5100 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro M5100.
- FirePro M5100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5100 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5100 is 151 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- FirePro M5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M5100 is 1512 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 70% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 59% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 31% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 57% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 45% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 57% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 37% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 44% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 13% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 23% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 38% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than FirePro M5100. |
Full Specs
FirePro M5100 | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
Code name | Venus | GF100 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 1 October 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.00 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 108 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro M5100 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
- FirePro M5100 vs Quadro 5000M
- Tesla C2070 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Tesla C2070 vs Quadro 5000M
- FirePro M5100 vs GeForce GTX 590
- FirePro M5100 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost