FirePro W4190M vs Tesla C2070
When choosing between FirePro W4190M and Tesla C2070, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W4190M and Tesla C2070.
Tesla C2070
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 251 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- FirePro W4190M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 1012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 250% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 97% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 333% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 142% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 142% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |