FirePro W5100 vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between FirePro W5100 and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W5100 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W5100
Tesla C2070
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
- Tesla C2070 has 376% more power consumption, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W5100.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 356 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- FirePro W5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Tesla C2070 is 77 mm longer, than FirePro W5100.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 3012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 4% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 2% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 11% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
FirePro W5100 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 4% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Tesla C2070. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Bonaire | GF100 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 171 mm | 248 mm |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |