FirePro W9000 vs Tesla C2070

When choosing between FirePro W9000 and Tesla C2070, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W9000 and Tesla C2070.

FirePro W9000 Check Price

Tesla C2070

Main Specs

	FirePro W9000	Tesla C2070
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	238 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI	1x DVI
	Check Price

FirePro W9000 has 47% more power consumption, than Tesla C2070.
FirePro W9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro W9000 and Tesla C2070 have maximum RAM of 6 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro W9000 is 401 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
FirePro W9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
FirePro W9000 is 31 mm longer, than Tesla C2070.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W9000 is 2512 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	16−18
ultra / 1080p	21−24	9−10
QHD / 1440p	16−18	3−4
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	30−35
medium / 1080p	40−45	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 111% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p	55−60	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	35−40	6−7
4K / 2160p	18−20	5−6
low / 720p	100−110	55−60
medium / 1080p	60−65	30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W9000 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	210−220
medium / 768p	220−230	180−190
ultra / 1080p	180−190	100−110
QHD / 1440p	110−120	60−65
4K / 2160p	70−75	30−35
high / 768p	210−220	150−160
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	40−45
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
FirePro W9000 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	110−120	100−110
ultra / 1080p	100−110	70−75
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p	45−50	20−22
ultra / 1080p	40−45	18−20
QHD / 1440p	27−30	18−20
4K / 2160p	14−16	6−7
low / 720p	80−85	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p	60−65	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	27−30	12−14
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	100−110
medium / 1080p	110−120	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Fortnite is 89% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p	60−65	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	30−35	10−11
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	55−60
medium / 1080p	65−70	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 110% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	140−150	90−95
medium / 768p	120−130	80−85
high / 1080p	70−75	30−35
ultra / 1080p	30−35	12−14
QHD / 1440p	21−24	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 79% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p	24−27	10−11
ultra / 1080p	20−22	8−9
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
low / 720p	65−70	30−35
medium / 1080p	30−35	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	130−140	110−120
medium / 1080p	120−130	110−120
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2070.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	16−18	9−10
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	30−35
medium / 1080p	35−40	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	130−140	60−65
medium / 768p	85−90	35−40
high / 1080p	45−50	21−24
ultra / 1080p	24−27	12−14
4K / 2160p	16−18	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	35−40
high / 768p	60−65	55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla C2070.

Full Specs

	FirePro W9000	Tesla C2070
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi
Code name	Tahiti	GF100
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	14 June 2012	25 July 2011
Pipelines	2048	448
Core clock speed	975 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	124.8	32.14
Floating-point performance	3,994 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	279 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	2988 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	143.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	460 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price

FirePro W9000 vs Tesla C2070

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares