GeForce 930A vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 930A and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 930A stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 930A
Tesla C2070
Main Specs
GeForce 930A | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
- Tesla C2070 has 621% more power consumption, than GeForce 930A.
- GeForce 930A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce 930A.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 930A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 930A is 354 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce 930A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 986 MHz higher, than GeForce 930A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 218% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 97% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 266% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 142% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 218% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 130% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 280% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce 930A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 930A | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Code name | GM108 | GF100 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 928 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 941 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 22.58 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 5.0 | 2.0 |