GeForce 940MX vs Tesla C2070
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 940MX and Tesla C2070. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 940MX and Tesla C2070. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2070
GeForce 940MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 940MX | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 23 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 934% more power consumption, than GeForce 940MX.
- GeForce 940MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 940MX.
- GeForce 940MX is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 940MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 548 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce 940MX is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 1012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 122% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 133% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 64% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 28% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 61% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 144% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 92% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 130% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 89% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 128% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 21% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 45% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 90% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 115% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 940MX | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Code name | N16S-GTR-B/S | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 10 March 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 102 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |