GeForce GT 640M LE vs Tesla C2070
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GT 640M LE and Tesla C2070. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GT 640M LE and Tesla C2070. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2070
GeForce GT 640M LE is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 640M LE is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 640M LE here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 640M LE | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3\DDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 1090% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 640M LE.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 640M LE.
- GeForce GT 640M LE is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 640M LE is build with Fermi / Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- GeForce GT 640M LE is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 1188 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 640M LE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 640M LE and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 489% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce GT 640M LE and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 377% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 675% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 640M LE | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Fermi / Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N13P-LP | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 - 4000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | Up to 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 14 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |