GeForce GT 750M SLI vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between GeForce GT 750M SLI and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 750M SLI will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2070
GeForce GT 750M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 750M SLI | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 750M SLI.
- GeForce GT 750M SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M SLI is 393 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GT 750M SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 988 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 13% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 15% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 9% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 10% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 8% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 750M SLI | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | N14P-GT | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 April 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1300 Million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |