GeForce GTS 160M vs Tesla C2070
When choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Tesla C2070, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTS 160M and Tesla C2070.
Tesla C2070
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 160M | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 296% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla C2070 has 5 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 926 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTS 160M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 489% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTS 160M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 377% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 675% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 160M | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | G9x | Fermi |
Code name | N10E-GS1 | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 64 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 505 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 19 billion/sec | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 51 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Gigaflops | 288 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
Power management | 8.0 | |
Check Price |