GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
Tesla C2070
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
- Tesla C2070 has 98% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB.
- GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is 932 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is 2 mm longer, than Tesla C2070.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is 5020 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 29% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in Fortnite is 19% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in Grand Theft Auto V is 22% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Code name | GP106 | GF100 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 26 December 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1709 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 136.7 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 250 mm | 248 mm |
| Memory bus width | 160 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.2 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 2.0 |