GeForce GTX 460M vs Tesla C2070
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460M and Tesla C2070. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460M and Tesla C2070. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2070
GeForce GTX 460M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 376% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 460M has 1530 GB more memory, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GTX 460M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460M and Tesla C2070 are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M is 776 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GTX 460M and Tesla C2070 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 1738 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 242% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 288% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 108% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 86% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 260% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | N11E-GS | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 3 September 2010 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 16.1 billion/sec | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 60.0 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 33 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |