GeForce GTX 660M vs Tesla C2070
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 660M and Tesla C2070. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 660M and Tesla C2070. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2070
GeForce GTX 660M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 660M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 660M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 660M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 376% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 660M.
- GeForce GTX 660M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 660M.
- GeForce GTX 660M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 660M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 660M is 261 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GTX 660M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 988 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 122% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 130% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 89% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 115% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 660M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | N13E-GE | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 835 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.4 billion/sec | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 729.6 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 36 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |