GeForce GTX 670MX vs Tesla C2070
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 670MX and Tesla C2070. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 670MX and Tesla C2070. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2070
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 670MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670MX | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 217% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
- GeForce GTX 670MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
- GeForce GTX 670MX is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670MX is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 670MX is 26 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GTX 670MX is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 1588 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 84% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 49% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670MX | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N13E-GR | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 October 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 960 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion/sec | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 67.2 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 670MX vs GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
- GeForce GTX 670MX vs Iris Pro Graphics 580
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
- Tesla C2070 vs Iris Pro Graphics 580
- GeForce GTX 670MX vs GeForce GTX 590
- GeForce GTX 670MX vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost