GeForce GTX 675MX vs Tesla C2070
When comparing GeForce GTX 675MX and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 675MX and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
GeForce GTX 675MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 675MX | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 138% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 675MX.
- GeForce GTX 675MX is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 675MX.
- GeForce GTX 675MX is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 675MX is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 675MX is 26 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GTX 675MX is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 1188 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 675MX | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N13E-GSR | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 October 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 960 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion/sec | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,256 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 63 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 675MX vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
- GeForce GTX 675MX vs FirePro W4100
- Tesla C2070 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
- Tesla C2070 vs FirePro W4100
- GeForce GTX 675MX vs GeForce GTX 590
- GeForce GTX 675MX vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost