GeForce GTX 765M vs Tesla C2070
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 765M and Tesla C2070. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 765M and Tesla C2070. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2070
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 765M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 765M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 765M | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 217% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 765M.
- GeForce GTX 765M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 765M.
- GeForce GTX 765M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 765M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M is 276 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GTX 765M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 988 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 765M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 54% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 765M | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N14-GE | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 863 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 55.23 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,326 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |