GeForce GTX 860M vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 860M and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 860M stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2070
GeForce GTX 860M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 860M | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 217% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 860M.
- GeForce GTX 860M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 860M.
- GeForce GTX 860M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 860M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M is 223 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GTX 860M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
GeForce GTX 860M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Battlefield 5 is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−105 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
GeForce GTX 860M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
GeForce GTX 860M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
GeForce GTX 860M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Grand Theft Auto V is 2% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
GeForce GTX 860M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 860M | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Code name | N15P-GX | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 915 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.40 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 860M vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- GeForce GTX 860M vs Radeon Pro 555X
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs Radeon Pro 555X
- GeForce GTX 860M vs GeForce GTX 590
- GeForce GTX 860M vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost