GeForce GTX 860M SLI vs Tesla C2070
When comparing GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
GeForce GTX 860M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 860M SLI | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 98% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M SLI is 455 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M SLI is 2012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 35% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 40% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 210−220 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Fortnite is 30% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 100−105 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Metro Exodus is 53% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 35% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2070. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 860M SLI | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Code name | GF100 | |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 2x 1870 Million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
SLI options | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |