GeForce GTX 870M vs Tesla C2070
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 870M and Tesla C2070. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 870M and Tesla C2070. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2070
GeForce GTX 870M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 870M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 870M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 870M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 138% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 870M.
- GeForce GTX 870M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 870M and Tesla C2070 have maximum RAM of 6 GB.
- GeForce GTX 870M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 870M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 870M is 367 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GTX 870M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 1% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| GeForce GTX 870M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Far Cry 5 is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Fortnite is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| GeForce GTX 870M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| GeForce GTX 870M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 870M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | N15P-GT | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 March 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1344 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 941 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 967 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 108.3 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,599 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 120.0 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| CUDA cores | 1344 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |