GeForce GTX 965M vs Tesla C2070
When comparing GeForce GTX 965M and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 965M and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 965M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 965M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 965M.
- GeForce GTX 965M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 965M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 370 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GTX 965M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 488 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 17% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 965M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Far Cry 5 is 19% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 17% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 965M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Code name | N16E-GS, N16E-GR | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 944 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 73.60 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,355 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| G-SYNC support | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| CUDA cores | 1024 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GameStream | + | |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| BatteryBoost | + | |
| Check Price |