GeForce GTX 980M vs Tesla C2070
When comparing GeForce GTX 980M and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 980M and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
GeForce GTX 980M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 980M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 980M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 980M | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 980M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 980M has 2 GB more memory, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GTX 980M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 980M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 980M is 464 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GTX 980M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 488 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 980M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 123% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Battlefield 5 is 132% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 980M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 980M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Far Cry 5 is 123% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Fortnite is 100% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Forza Horizon 4 is 123% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Metro Exodus is 161% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 139% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | − | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980M in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 980M | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Code name | GM204 | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 7 October 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1127 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 51.84 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 3,462 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |