GeForce MX130 vs Tesla C2070
When choosing between GeForce MX130 and Tesla C2070, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce MX130 and Tesla C2070.
Tesla C2070
GeForce MX130 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX130 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX130 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX130 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5, DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 693% more power consumption, than GeForce MX130.
- GeForce MX130 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce MX130.
- GeForce MX130 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX130 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX130 is 548 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce MX130 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX130 is 2024 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 84% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 58% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 76% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 62% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 28% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than GeForce MX130. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX130 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Code name | N16S-GTR | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 January 2018 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 29.81 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |