GeForce MX330 vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce MX330 and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce MX330 stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2070
GeForce MX330 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX330 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX330 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX330 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 2280% more power consumption, than GeForce MX330.
- GeForce MX330 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce MX330.
- GeForce MX330 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX330 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 957 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce MX330 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 4012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 21% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 25% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 17% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 8% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| GeForce MX330 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX330 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Code name | N17S-LP / N17S-G3 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 20 February 2020 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1531 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1594 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.26 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 2.0 |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |